Australian authorities searched today for the remains of a 55-year-old surfer after a witness reportedly saw an attack by a large shark that “had his body in his mouth”.

There has been no trace of the victim since the marine predator struck Tuesday morning near the popular surfing spot of Granites Beach in South Australia, police said.

“The man’s body is yet to be found and the search resumed early this morning,” police said in a statement.

A 70-year-old surfer at the scene when the attack happened, Ian Brophy, said he was about to enter the water when someone yelled: “Shark!”

“As I turned around, I saw the shark go and just launch and bite,” he told Adelaide’s The Advertiser newspaper.

Brophy said he saw the predator go “over the top of the guy and bite and drag him down under the water and then nothing for a minute or two and blood everywhere and then up pops the board”.

“I saw him in the wave and the shark had his body in his mouth — it was pretty gruesome,” he said.

Within a few minutes, there was no sign of the surfer’s body.

“It took every bit of him, I think.”

Jeff Schmucker, a local resident, told national broadcaster ABC that he used his jet ski to help emergency services search for the surfer.

Schmucker said he went to the area of the attack and soon saw a great white shark “the length of a sedan car” — but he could not be sure if it was the killer.

Great white sharks are known to prowl South Australia’s coastline.

A teacher was mauled to death in May about 120 kilometres (75 miles) from the site of Tuesday’s attack.

The number of shark bites has increased over the past four decades due to factors such as human population growth and climate change, according to shark expert Charlie Huveneers from Flinders University.

As oceans get warmer, ecosystems are being forced to adapt and sharks may be following their prey and moving closer to shores, where they are more likely to come into contact with humans.

Huveneers told AFP that sharks sometimes attack humans because they mistake them for their usual prey, but also due to curiosity, hunger, self-defence and aggression.

Before Harrdy Sandhu entered the world of entertainment, he had a brief career as a cricketer and even represented India on the under-19 cricket team. Mr Sandhu was a fast bowler for Punjab and came close to being part of the Indian ICC U-19 Cricket World Cup 2006 squad. Unfortunately, he missed out on the opportunity due to some unforeseen circumstances. In a recent interview, he shared reasons why he wasn’t selected for the team, and one particular revelation from that interview has gained significant attention on the internet.

Appearing on a podcast ‘Figuring Out With Raj Shamani’, Mr Sandhu said the Under-19 team, while preparing for the 2006 World Cup in Sri Lanka, held a training camp in Pune. This camp invited 30 talented cricketers from all corners of the country. Each player was scheduled to participate in three matches during the camp, and the final team for the World Cup was to be selected by the selectors and the coach based on their performances in these matches. Mr Sandhu spoke about his notable performance during the camp, mentioning that in his first match, he managed to dismiss cricketers like Rohit Sharma, Cheteshwar Pujara, Ravindra Jadeja, Pinal Shah, and Yo Mahesh. This impressive performance led him to believe that he was on track to secure a spot in the Under-19 team for the upcoming World Cup.

Watch the video here:

However, despite his outstanding performance in the camp, Mr Sandhu was unable to secure a spot on the final team.

The selectors at that time were Pravin Amre, Dilip Vengsarkar, and one more person.

“We were batting on the third day, and it was my turn to bat. I asked Rahul Sharma, a former India and Punjab spinner, for a bat. Rahul was often called ‘Venky.’ Coincidentally, Venkatesh Prasad, who was our coach, was sitting in front of me. I called out ‘Venky’ to Rahul, but to my surprise, Venkatesh Prasad thought I was addressing him. Perhaps he took offense to this, and it might have influenced his decision to stick with the same squad that had played in the last two U-19 tournaments,”  Mr Sandhu said.

Harrdy Sandhu claimed this was one of the potential reasons for his non-selection in the team, and this particular revelation has been gaining significant attention on the internet. It has stirred a lot of reactions from users on social media, making it a viral topic of discussion.

If you’re a fan of Asian cuisine, you must’ve had ramen and noodles at some point. You must be wondering why we are mentioning them as different. Aren’t they supposed to be the same? Well, this is a common belief, but it’s not at all true. While both are made using wheat flour dough and served with different sauces and broths, there are many other things that set them apart. Whether you’re an Asian food lover or someone who likes to be updated with their food knowledge, it’s good to know the differences between these two popular dishes. Without further ado, let’s gain a deeper understanding of them below.

What Is Ramen?

Ramen is a popular Japanese-style noodle dish. The fact that they are served in a broth is what makes them so unique. The broth usually includes flavours of soy sauce or miso and includes meat or vegetables. Ramen is further topped with different ingredients, such as eggs, scallions, etc.

What Are Noodles?

Noodles do not have one particular characteristic. They include different varieties of noodles, including ramen. So while ramen is a type of noodle, not all noodles are ramen. Noodles can include rice noodles, soba, spaghetti, and more. No one thing makes them unique, as they are all made using different ingredients and methods.
Also Read: Solving The Mystery: Are Singapore Noodles Actually From Singapore?

Ramen Vs Noodles: What Are The Differences Between The Two:

1. Difference in ingredients:

The types of ingredients that are used to make ramen and noodles differ to a great extent. Ramen is made with wheat flour, salt, water, and a type of alkaline water called kansui. This last ingredient is what sets them apart from regular noodles. Noodles, on the other hand, are made using the first three ingredients alone. Ramen is always served in a broth, whereas noodles are flavoured with a variety of sauces.

2. Difference in preparation:

The preparation style of ramen and noodles is also not the same. While both are boiled, ramen is cooked in kansui water. Once done, it is rinsed with cold water to remove the excess starch and then added to the broth. This process is called blanching and helps give it its distinct chewy texture. Whereas noodles are simply boiled in salted water, drained, and then served with the desired sauce or topping.

3. Difference in texture:

If you look closely, you’ll also notice a difference in texture between the two. Ramen is usually thicker in texture as compared to regular noodles. They are not as thick as other varieties, but they have a somewhat medium thickness and a chewy texture. Whereas noodles come in a variety of forms and are known for having a thinner consistency with a smoother texture.
Also Read: Boiled Extra Noodles? Here Are 5 Creative Ways To Make Use Of Them

4. Difference in flavour:

Ramen and noodles have a different flavour profile as well. The former is known for having a distinct umami flavour. This primarily comes from the broth and seasonings that are served with it. Noodles, on the other hand, can be flavoured in a variety of different ways too, depending on the sauces you use. However, they may not have that umami flavour that is in ramen.

So, the next time you find yourself confused between ramen and noodles, you’ll know exactly what sets them apart.