Amid the massive backlash surrounding her remark on the divorce of celebrity couple Naga Chaitanya and Samantha Ruth Prabhu, Telangana Minister Konda Surekha apologised to the actors and their families, but did not back down from her allegations against Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader KT Rama Rao. She also stressed that Mr Rao, also known as KTR, must apologise.

Ms Surekha has alleged that KTR, a former minister, tapped the phones of actresses and blackmailed them. In this connection, she said he was behind the divorce of Samantha Ruth Prabhu and Naga Chaitanya. “It is KT Rama Rao because of whom (actress) Samantha’s divorce happened… He was a minister at that time and used to tap the phones of the actresses and then find their weaknesses to blackmail them… He used to make them drug addicts and then do this… Everyone knows this, Samantha, Naga Chaitanya, his family — everybody is aware that such a thing happened,” she said.

The remarks sparked a massive row. Both Samantha Ruth Prabhu and Naga Chaitanya are top actors. Naga Chaitanya also belongs to the Akkineni family, among the most influential families in the Telugu film industry.

Nagarjuna Akkineni, his father and veteran actor, responded sharply to the minister’s remarks. “I strongly condemn the comments of the Honorable Minister Mrs. Konda Surekha. Don’t use the lives of movie stars who stay away from politics to criticize your opponents. Please respect other people’s privacy. As a woman in a responsible position, your comments and accusations against our family are completely irrelevant and false. I request you to withdraw your comments immediately,” he said. 

Naga Chaitanya and Samanth Ruth Prabhu responded too.

Naga Chaitanya said the decision of a divorce is “one of the most painful and unfortunate life decisions one has to make”. “After a lot of thought, a mutual decision was made by me and my former spouse to part ways. It was a decision made in peace, owing to our different life goals and in the interest of moving forward with respect and dignity as two mature adults. However, there have been various baseless and completely ridiculous gossips on the matter so far. I have remained silent all this while out of deep respect for my earlier spouse as well as my family,” he said.

“Today, the claim made by Minister Konda surekha garu is not only false, it is absolutely ridiculous and unacceptable. Women deserve to be supported and respected. Taking advantage and exploiting the personal life decisions of celebrities for the sake of media headlines is shameful,” he added.

Samantha Ruth Prabhu said it takes a lot of courage and strength for a woman to survive in a glamorous industry where women are more often than not treated as props. “Konda Surekha Garu, I am proud of what this journey turned me into please don’t trivialise it. I hope you realise that your words carry significant weight as a minister. I implore you to be responsible and respectful of individuals’ privacy. My divorce is a personal matter, and I request that you refrain from speculating about it. Our choice to keep things private doesn’t invite misrepresentation,” she said in a social media post. “To clarify: my divorce was mutual consent and amicable, with no political conspiracy involved. Could you please keep my name out of political battles? I have always remained non-political and wish to continue doing so,” she added.

Top actors, including Chiranjeevi, Jr NTR, Allu Arjun and Nani, slammed the minister’s remarks.

Amid the backlash, Ms Surekha earlier responded to Samantha Ruth Prabhu and said she did not intend to hurt her sentiments.

“My comments are meant to question a leader’s belittling of women and not to hurt your (Samantha Prabhu) sentiments. The way you have grown up with self-power is not only an admiration for me but also an ideal…If you or your fans are offended by my comments, I unconditionally retract my comments. Don’t think otherwise,” she said.

Former minister KTR has, meanwhile, sent a defamation notice to Ms Surekha. He has accused the ruling Congress of “disgusting and nauseating politics” and requested its leader Rahul Gandhi to send the minister to a mental health specialist. 

“Modi and business tycoon Adani are close allies. Their fate is intertwined. Adani Enterprises tried to raise funds in the stock market but failed. Adani is accused of stock manipulation and his stock collapsed like a house of cards,” said billionaire hedge fund investor and philanthropist George Soros at the Munich Security Conference on February 17, 2023. 

“Modi is silent on the subject but he will have to answer questions from foreign investors and in Parliament. This has significantly weakened Modi’s stranglehold on India’s federal government and opened the door to push much needed institutional reforms. I may be naive, but I expect a democratic revival in India,” he concluded. 

What Soros meant by democratic revival was probably regime change – but the plan did not work.

The Indian Express today published a report about the Income Tax department’s findings in probes into various NGOs – Oxfam, Centre for Policy Research (CPR), Environics Trust (ET), Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment (LIFE) and Care India Solution for Sustainable Development (CISSD).

The IT Department has found that these NGOs were using foreign funds and collaborated with foreign entities to stall projects by the Adani Group. They found that these NGOs funded each other for anti-national activities which violated the law.

NDTV has access to the FIR filed by the CBI against Oxfam India after the agency raided the NGO’s offices in Delhi on April 19, 2023.

The CBI’s FIR opened up serious questions on what the international NGO was doing with its foreign funding. While violation of the FCRA Act is evident, the Bureau asks a more worrying question – was Oxfam India working as a foreign agent on behalf of foreign powers? 

“This exposed the Oxfam India as a probable instrument of foreign policy of foreign organisations/entities which have funded the Oxfam India liberally over the years,” states the FIR. 

Below is a summary of the key points in the FIR. 

1. Routing funds through other means despite FCRA registration having been cancelled.

As per the Income Tax Department survey of Oxfam India, its income is as below.

The FIR takes a serious view of this and states – “Oxfam India and its employees appears (sic) to be supporting agitational activities. 

Centre for Policy Research (CPR) received Rs 12 lakh towards “short-term training” of which Rs 5 lakh was for CPR to use in any way they pleased. Foreign funding was in effect being given as a commission, to circumvent the Act. 

A large number of NGOs also received sub-grants from the FCRA amount. A total of Rs 2.2 crore was paid out to various NGOs by Oxfam India after September 2020 when the FCRA Act was amended to make such sub-grants illegal.
 
Oxfam India had funded Environics Trust to “mobilize communities with the help of local unions against the coal industries. A portion of the agreement between the two NGOs is reproduced in the FIR.

 2. Creation of a new structure to continue funding NGOs while bypassing FCRA laws

Since Oxfam India’s FCRA registration was cancelled, the NGO drew up a new structure that would continue to help it carry out its unstated objectives. The idea was that Oxfam India would co-ordinate with foreign funders (Affiliates) and get them to fund handpicked Affiliate NGOs directly through the FCRA route. One such example noted in their email exchanges is that of NGO Samvad. 
 
Oxfam India would also set up For-Profit Companies (FPCs) which would completely oversee the expenditure and the project work of these Affiliate NGOs. 
 
Oxfam India would have an “arms-length” approach to both the FPC and the Affiliate NGOs, while in reality driving the whole agenda from behind the scenes. 
 
Affiliate NGOs such as Samvad were chosen for funding as Affiliate NGOs on the condition that they would allow Oxfam India “complete freedom to plan the program and staffing in manner they want.” 

Below is an email excerpt which is part of the CBI FIR. 

The diagram below is replicated from the CBI FIR. It outlines the roles and responsibilities of each part of the new structure. XXX indicates Oxfam India. 

Below is an email excerpt that shows the possible names for the FPCs that were to be created by Oxfam India. 

3. Plans to pressurise the Indian government through foreign governments & foreign institutions 

Oxfam India was planning to use its influence with the World Bank, IMF, European Union, US State Department, Asian Development Bank and a clutch of European governments to put pressure on the Indian government to renew its FCRA registration.

The Irish embassy was also approached by Oxfam India by Amitabh Behar in an effort to get the Ireland government to lean on India to renew FCRA. The excerpt of the email is below. 

4. Suspicious donations from huge number of foreign individuals 

Strangely, a large number of donations have come in to Oxfam’s FCRA account from individuals abroad. Even stranger is that the amounts round off perfectly when converted into Indian rupees. And a large number of individuals have donated the exact same amount. Below is a sample of the individual donations from abroad. 

The amount of money donated by foreign individuals via the FCRA route is suspiciously high.
 
A British citizen by name Banwari Lal had gifted Oxfam India immovable property in Haryana in 2020. Oxfam India sold it for Rs 4 crore but showed the value of the land as Rs 2.46 crore only. This has raised suspicions about evasion of stamp duty.

About Oxfam India

Amitabh Behar was the CEO of Oxfam India and was a former Executive Director of the National Foundation for India. Behar is a mentee of Salil Shetty who was, until recently, Vice President – Global Operations in Soros’ Open Society Foundations (OSF). The organisations led by Behar have been the recipients of major funding from Soros’ Open Society Foundations (OSF) as well as other foreign NGOs that are funded by the OSF. Behar is said to have gone abroad shortly after the CBI raided the NGO.

NGOs are explicitly forbidden from sub-funding other NGOs – they must use the donations they receive only for the stated purpose that they have been formed.

But Oxfam has sub-funded a host of other NGOs. Here are some of them.

Centre for Equity Studies led by Harsh Mander, a former member of Sonia Gandhi’s National Advisory Council who was also recently in the running for a Nobel. This organisation has received Rs 1.2 crore from Oxfam. 

Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment (LIFE) which was founded by advocate Ritwick Dutta. Dutta was legal counsel for Fathima Babu, one of the leaders of the anti-Sterlite protests in Thoothukudi in 2018. 

Association for Rural and Urban Needy (ARUN) in Telangana which is run by Bezwada Wilson. Partners of Oxfam in ARUN include the Fund For Global Human Rights, a Washington DC based organisation for building activism and protest groups across the world. 

Swadhikar or National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights (NCDHR), founded in 1998 and now led by Paul Divakar Namala. 

Oxfam India also granted Rs 1.4 crore to the Centre for Social Equity and Inclusion (CSEI) between 2016-17 and 2020-21 as shown in their FCRA filings with the Indian government. 

Oxfam India itself has, as its donors, the Malala Fund. The Malala Fund is another well-known fund that donates to promote education for girls and is funded by Soros’ Open Society Foundation. 

About Centre for Policy Research (CPR) 

Centre for Policy Research is another NGO named in the Indian Express report as having allegedly carried out agitations and other activities against the Adani Group.

CPR’s direct foreign funding in 2019-20 was Rs 24.5 crore. Apart from this, it had unspent FCRA funds to the tune of Rs 43.7 crore. 

CPR had received Rs 11.63 crore from the Ford Foundation during 2013-2019 to study ‘urban research network.’ 

By the financial year ended March 2021, CPR had a balance amount of Rs 2.3 crore given in grants by the Ford Foundation. It also had Rs 1.6 crore balance from grants given by the Omidyar Network. And from Washington DC-based Namati, CPR had a balance of Rs 8.2 lakh. 

In 2022, as per FCRA data available on the site, Namati had provided funding of Rs 2 crore. 

The same year, the Ford Foundation had provided funding to the tune of Rs 52 lakhs. 

The World Resources Institute (WRI) had provided funding to the tune of Rs 89 lakhs in 2022. 

World Resources Institute has listed as a major donor, Soros’ Open Society. While the exact funding is not provided, Soros’ OSF appears to have provided more than USD 750,000 in funding to WRI between 2020 and 2022. 

Let us take a look at Namati as well. Namati is directly funded by George Soros’ OSF and Luminate, the Ford Foundation as well as by the US State Department. 

In fact, George Soros is on the Advisory Board of Namati, as per its website. 

The CPR is headed by Chairperson Meenakshi Gopinath and President and Chief Executive Yamini Aiyar. Earlier CPR was headed by journalist Pratap Bhanu Mehta.

About LIFE

LIFE or Legal Initiative For Forest And Environment was founded in 2005 by two lawyers – Ritwick Dutta and Rahul Choudhary. LIFE’s aim is to promote environmental democracy through means of law. LIFE does not litigate by itself; it assists and supports groups which wish to do so.

Dutta has been involved in a number of high profile cases – he represented the petitioner who filed a case at the National Green Tribunal (NGT) against conducting the World Cultural Festival on the banks of the Yamuna river in 2016, by the Art of Living. As mentioned earlier in the article, he was also legal counsel for one of the lead protesters in the anti-Sterlite protests that rocked Tamil Nadu in 2018.

Dutta has also argued cases against dams in Uttarkhand & North Eastern India, Lafarge project in Himachal Pradesh, Vedanta bauxite mining in Niyamgiri, Jindal Steel in Chattisgarh, illegal sand mining in Uttar Pradesh, moving lions from Gujarat to Madhya Pradesh and others.

FCRA details of foreign funds inflow into LIFE are shown in the table below.

About Environics Trust

Founded by the late Sreedhar Ramamurthi, a retired official of ONGC and the Central government’s Atomic Minerals Directorate, this NGO is alleged to have collaborated with the Mineral Inheritors Right Association “for protesting against Jindal Steel Work Protest in Odisha and Adani Coal Projects in Odisha,” as per the IT Department.

Adani Watch, a group that campaigns against Adani Group’s activities wrote a rousing eulogy for Ramamurthi.

The agencies have just unearthed the tip of the iceberg. Many more NGOs and the brains behind them continue to operate actively in India at the behest of their foreign masters. The long arm of the law will catch up with them soon.

(Disclaimer: New Delhi Television is a subsidiary of AMG Media Networks Limited, an Adani Group Company.)