Live · Global · Independent
Live Feeds
PinkVilla
Forbes
NDTV
Hindustan Times
Why Did Justin Bieber Leave ‘Burn It’ Remarks Over JoJo Siwa’s IG Post; Feud Explained
onmynews.com

Why Did Justin Bieber Leave ‘Burn It’ Remarks Over JoJo Siwa’s IG Post; Feud Explained

On December 22, 2018, Jojo Siwa treated her massive Instagram family to a very colorful early Christmas gift. The present in question was a BMW with high customization all over, flickering Siwa’s name, and an extremely realistic painting of her smiling face. This highly vibrant vehicle became the immediate talk among her fans.

It’s hard not to think that Justin Bieber—the painter and former YouTube sensation with a well-documented penchant for customized cars—would have at least appreciated the wacky design. After all, a year earlier, he was spotted tooling around Los Angeles in an SUV covered in snowflakes, ornaments, and Santas as a response to accusations that he was ruining Christmas. But Bieber’s response was the opposite. He slagged the thing off by responding to Siwa’s post with the unvarnished comment: “Burn it.”

Jojo Siwa, along with her mother, Jessalynn, didn’t take Bieber’s comment too well. The latter replied fast, telling Bieber to “burn your own things.”

Jojo appeared visibly shaken after the very public exchange. She posted a picture of the remarks on Twitter along with her own brief reply, “BURN IT.” The growing drama surrounding the issue caused the internet to go crazy.

Feeling the burn, Justin Bieber took to Twitter to offer a few apologetic remarks. He elaborated: “I have nothing against you it was the car and the colors I didn’t like I really hope you didn’t think it was malicious or mean-spirited.” This apology aimed at diffusing the tension and explaining that his comment wasn’t anything personal.

Jojo took Bieber’s apology in a classy and humorous manner. She answered, “it’s all good bro! You can perform at my 16th birthday party and we’ll call it good!”  Jojo’s amiable reaction not only helped to defuse the situation but also showed her poise when accepting criticism. Even with the early drama, the incident had a positive ending.

ALSO READ: ‘It’s Not Easy’: JoJo Siwa Talks About Facing ‘Tough’ Criticism During iHeartRadio Music Awards 2024 Appearance

Read full article
“No Interference In Any Religious Body”: Kiren Rijiju Defends Waqf Bill
onmynews.com

“No Interference In Any Religious Body”: Kiren Rijiju Defends Waqf Bill

Opposition parties led by the Congress joined ranks to protest against the Waqf Amendment Bill in Lok Sabha today. The legislation aims to address issues related to powers of State Waqf Boards, registration and survey of Waqf properties and removal of encroachment.

The legislation proposes to amend 44 sections of the 1995 Waqf Act. The Bill proposes that the Central Waqf Council and state Waqf Boards must have two women. It also lays down that money received by the Waqf Board must be used for the welfare of widows, divorcees, and orphans in the manner suggested by the government. Another key proposal is that women’s inheritances must be protected. The provision for including non-Muslim members of Waqf bodies is another contentious point in the proposed law. 

During the discussion of the Bill in Lok Sabha, Congress’s KC Venugopal termed the proposed law “draconian” and said it is an attack on the freedom of religion and federal system. He also opposed the provision of appointing non-Muslim members to Waqf board.

Samajwadi Party, the second-largest Opposition force, has also opposed the Bill. “This Bill has been introduced as part of well-thought-out politics. When there is a democratic process for election, why nominate people. No person from outside the community is part of other religious bodies. What is the point of including non-Muslims in Waqf bodies?” party chief and MP Akhilesh Yadav said.
Another Samajwadi Party MP Mohibbullah said, “This is injustice to Muslims. “We are going to commit a huge mistake, we will suffer because of this Bill for centuries. This is interference with religion.”

Earlier, Mr Yadav had alleged that the BJP wants to sell of lands belonging to Waqf boards in the guise of amendments. “All these amendments of the ‘Waqf Board’ are just an excuse; Selling lands like defence, railway and Nazul land is the target,” he said in a post on X. While Trinamool’s Sudip Bandhyopadhyay said the legislation is against federalism, DMK’s K Kanimozhi said it is against the minority community. “Will it be possible for Christian and Muslim to handle Hindu temples?” she asked.

Defending the legislation, Union Minister and leader of BJP ally JDU, Rajiv Ranjan Singh, said the Bill has been brought to make the functioning of Waqf boards transparent. Countering the Opposition’s charge that the Bill is against minorities, he referred to the 1984 anti-Sik riots in the aftermath of the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. “Who killed thousands of Sikhs?” he asked.

Supriya Sule of NCP’s Sharad Pawar faction said the government did not carry out detailed consultation before bringing the Bill to the House. “Please send this to the standing committee for better consultation. The timing is of concern. What happened suddenly in Waqf board that you have to bring the Bill,” she asked.

ET Mohammed Basheer of the Indian Union Muslim League and K Radhakrishan of the CPM opposed the Bill too.

AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi opposed the legislation, calling it discriminatory and a grave attack on the basic structure of the Constitution, as it violates judicial independence. “The Government has sought to severely restrict how Muslims can manage their Waqf property,” he said.

Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government had to bring amendments because previous Congress governments could not address issues in the law. “Because you couldn’t do, we had to bring these amendments. We are elected representatives, support this bill and you will get blessings of crores of people. Some people have captured Waqf boards and this Bill has been brought to give justice to ordinary Muslims.”

Mr Rijiju claimed that many leaders in the Opposition had privately told him that state waqf boards had turned into mafia. “I won’t take their names and destroy their political careers,” he said.

Read full article
‘No updates’ on when Sheikh Hasina will leave India, says MEA
onmynews.com

‘No updates’ on when Sheikh Hasina will leave India, says MEA

Post Content

Read full article
Link copied!