Swara Bhasker and Fahad Ahmad are celebrating their first wedding anniversary today. Swara posted some throwback pictures from their wedding days and penned a heartfelt note on Instagram, marking the special day. 

Swara wrote, “Wise men say, only fools rush in…’ Fahad & I certainly rushed into marriage, but were friends for 3 years prior. It was a love neither of us noticed blossoming, perhaps because the differences between us were many. Hindu-Muslim was only the most obvious. I’m older than Fahad & we come from different worlds: a big city girl from an ethnically mixed English speaking family & a small town boy from a traditional Western UP family that speaks Urdu & Hindustani. I’m an actress in Hindi films, he’s a research scholar, activist & politician. But our liberal arts education & values gave us a shared language of political beliefs & a common vision for our society & country. We met at the CAA-NRC protests in December 2019 & even organised one together. Slowly, we became close confidants.”

She further added, “I felt safe with Fahad & always seen by him. He said he could talk to me about anything without fear of judgement. After months of intense communication & night long conversations, I asked Fahad what next. He said though we were worlds apart, we were very compatible, he was very fond of me & if I waited 2-3 years for him to ‘settle’ we could marry. I was stunned but also disarmed by his confidence & candour.”

She concluded her post and wrote, “I always thought I had gone beyond the log kya kahenge mentality, but suddenly, I was worrying about how family, friends, filmy acquaintances & even my ever loyal trolls would react. I had to face the secret shadows in my heart. Amazingly, Fahad could read my unspoken fears & we worked through them. Our families were concerned, but we stood by our love. Our shocked parents accepted our BIG decision, though hesitantly & after gently laying out concerns. When they met us together, I think they felt reassured. We were married under the SMA one year ago today. Fittingly, a relationship that began at a protest to preserve the Constitution was solemnised under constitutional provisions. A month later (I was pregnant by then), we celebrated at my nana-nani’s home with shared customs. There was lots of music, feasting & a Daawat-e-Walima. The joyous 10-day affair felt like a cultural mahotsav.”

Swara Bhasker tied the knot with politician Fahad Ahmad on February 16, 2023, and welcomed their daughter, Raabiyaa, in September 2023.

See Also: Swara Bhasker takes daughter Raabiyaa on her first flight. Watch video: 

A day after the Supreme Court struck down the electoral bonds scheme – on grounds it violated citizens’ right to information, was unconstitutional, and may lead to quid pro quo arrangements between political parties and donors – the government has said it is “studying” the order.

Sources told NDTV the government is weighing options and will not, at this stage, move to overrule the country’s highest court, like it did in December when it passed a bill – with most opposition leaders suspended – to establish a new mechanism to appoint members of the Election Commission.

Sources also said the government is concerned about the return of black money, and had further noted that revealing donors’ identities – as instructed by the court – is “against laws of banking”.

Electoral bonds, sources said, were brought in to “reduce magnitude of black money” before 2017″ and were move the landscape of political funding “from a murky situation to a better system”.

The other model – under which trusts distribute contributions received by companies and individuals to political parties – “has been studied in the past, but its challenges were too many”, sources added.

The electoral bonds scheme was meant to “give comfort to donors”, government sources said.

BJP’s Response

This comes after top BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad said the bonds were part of his party’s “sincere efforts to make elections transparent”, but that it would also respect the court’s order.

READ | BJP Defends Electoral Bonds, But Says Respects Supreme Court Verdict

Mr Prasad, however, reserved further comment, pointing to the extensive final order (which runs into hundreds of pages) and stating it required study before the BJP decided its next course.

Supreme Court’s Electoral Bonds Verdict

On Thursday a bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud said the scheme could not compensate for its drawbacks. Electoral bonds, the court said, could not be the only way to curb black money.

The landmark order came just weeks before a general election.

The court ordered the State Bank of India to stop issuing bonds and provide details of donations made to the Election Commission, which was told to publish the data on its website by March 13.

READ | Electoral Bonds “Unconstitutional”, Stop Immediately: Supreme Court

Petitioners had argued the scheme, launched in 2018, allowed political parties to not disclose contributions received via this route, meaning companies could make unlimited fund transfers.

The crux of the issue were – does such unlimited corporate funding violate the principle of a free and fair election, and if the amendments violated the Right to Information Act.

READ | 2 Key Issues In Focus As Supreme Court Struck Down Electoral Bonds

During a hearing in November last year (the second hearing), the court also noted the bonds “provide (only) selective anonymity… ” since purchase records can be accessed by investigative agencies.

READ | “Selective Anonymity”: Supreme Court On Day 2 Of Electoral Bonds Hearing

This was in response to the government’s argument that absent provision for anonymous donations, a large volume of political funding could revert to black money. The government had also argued the provision for anonymous donation was needed to protect donors from “victimisation and retribution”.

What Opposition Said

The Congress welcomed the verdict, stating it reinforced the power of ‘votes’ over ‘notes. Senior leader, ex-Union Finance Minister P Chidambaram, said the “right of the people to know has been placed above all clever legal arguments… to defend the illegal electoral bonds scheme”.

READ | Court’s Electoral Bond Verdict Gives CPM A ‘I Told You So’ Moment

The Aam Aadmi Party called the verdict an important step in ensuring transparent polls, and the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a petitioner in the case, said electoral bonds were the “legalisation of political corruption”. The CPM was the only party that didn’t accept such donations.

What Are Electoral Bonds. Who Got How Much?

Electoral bonds are financial instruments that allow individuals and/or businesses to make anonymous donations to political parties. They were introduced by the BJP-led central government in 2018 as an alternative to cash donations and were pitched as an initiative to make political funding clean.

According to Election Commission data, 28,030 electoral bonds worth Rs 16,437.63 crore were sold between 2016 and 2022, with the BJP raking in over Rs 10,000 crore from that amount.

READ | Election Bonds Worth Rs 16,000 Crore Sold Till 2022. Who Got How Much

The party that got the next highest was the Congress, with less than Rs 1,600 crore.

In fact, donations to the BJP were thrice more than that given to the 30 other on the list.

NDTV is now available on WhatsApp channels. Click on the link to get all the latest updates from NDTV on your chat.

Rajkummar Rao, Triptii Dimri, Alia Bhatt & more on who they’re rooting for at Filmmfare Awards.