Netflix India has updated the opening disclaimer on its ‘IC-814 Kandahar Hijack” web series to include hijackers’ real and code names, Monika Shergill, the OTT giant’s Vice President (Content, India), said.

“For the benefit of audiences unfamiliar with the 1999 hijacking, the opening disclaimer has been updated… code names in the series now reflect those used during the event,” she said Tuesday.

Ms Shergill also said Netflix is “committed to showcasing stories with authentic representation”.

A massive row had erupted over the Netflix drama, which tells the story of the hijack of Indian Airlines flight IC-814 by Pakistan-based terror outfit Harkat-ul-Mujahideen in 1999. Five hijackers took control of the plane and diverted it to Afghanistan, which was then ruled by the Taliban.

The government, then led by Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, released three terrorists – Masood Azhar, Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh and Mushtaq Zargar – to secure the release of 154 hostages.

The ‘Bhola’, ‘Shankar’ Row

After the series was published hundreds of social media users accused the creators – Anubhav Sinha and Trishant Srivastava – of changing the names of two hijackers to ‘Bhola’ and ‘Shankar’.

This has been claimed as distortion of historical facts and critics have declared it misrepresents the terrorists’ real identities. They have also claimed it, therefore, offends Hindu sentiments.

READ | “Nobody Has Right To…”: Why Netflix Content Chief Was Summoned

However, in January 2000 the Union Home Ministry had revealed the real names of the five hijackers – Ibrahim Athar, Shahid Akhtar Sayed, Sunny Ahmed Qazi, Mistri Zahoor Ibrahim and Shakir.

The ministry noted that during the hijacking and the hostage scenario they referred to each other by code names, two of which were ‘Bhola’ and ‘Shankar’. The others were ‘chief’, ‘doctor’, and ‘burger’.

Journalists who covered the hijacking live put out social media posts amid the controversy, saying that passengers had told them the hijackers had, in fact, used these names to address each other.

“Playing With Indians Sentiments”

The protests had led to Ms Shergill being summoned by the Union Information and Broadcasting Ministry. Sources told NDTV she had been called as the government is taking the matter “very seriously”, and that “nobody has the right to play with the Indian people’s sentiments”.

READ | “Content Per Nation’s Sentiments”: Centre-Netflix IC 814 Series Meet

Earlier today Netflix India officials met government officials for over an hour, after which sources told NDTV the streaming service said future content will tally with those “sentiments”.

BJP social media chief Amit Malviya posted a vicious attack on X, accusing the creators of the series of trying to whitewash the criminal actions of Pakistani terrorists by giving them Hindu names.

On the other side, opposition leaders like Priyanka Chaturvedi of the Shiv Sena (UBT) and former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah criticised the selective outrage, and pointed to historical inaccuracies in other contentious films and series in recent months.

NDTV Explains | Controversy Surrounding Netflix’s ‘IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack’

The political spat aside there were demands on social media to boycott Netflix.

Netflix’s IC-814 Story

The Netflix re-telling is inspired by events on flight IC-814 and on ground in Kandahar and Delhi, as well as the book ‘Flight Into Fear: The Captain’s Story’ by Devi Sharan, who was the plane’s captain.

It stars Naseeruddin Shah and Pankaj Kapur in key roles.

NDTV is now available on WhatsApp channels. Click on the link to get all the latest updates from NDTV on your chat.

Amid massive protests over the rape and murder of a 31-year-old doctor in Kolkata’s RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, the West Bengal Assembly today passed the Aparajita Bill to amend some provisions in the criminal code, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, for the state. These amendments make penalties for rape and child abuse more stringent.

What Is Aparajita Bill?

The Bill seeks to amend several sections in the newly-introduced Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Section 64 in BNS lays down that a rape convict will face rigorous imprisonment not less than 10 years and this may extend to life term. The Bengal legislation tweaks this to enhance the jail term to the “remainder of that person’s natural life and fine, or with death”. It also adds that this fine shall be fair and reasonable to meet medical expenses and rehabilitation costs of the victim.

The Aparajita Bill also seeks to amend Section 66 of BNS, which lays down penalties for a convict if rape leads to the victim’s death or causes her to be in a “vegetative state”. While the Centre legislation lays down 20 years jail term, life imprisonment and death for such a crime, the Bengal Bill says the convict should get only death penalty.

Amending Section 70 of BNS, which deals with the penalty in gangrape cases, the Bengal legislation has done away with the option of a 20-year jail term and laid down provisions of life term and death for those convicted of gangrape.

The Bengal legislation also toughens the penalty in cases relating to publicising the identity of a victim of sexual violence. While the BNS has provision of jail term up to two years in such cases, Aparajita Bill provides for imprisonment between three and five years.

The Bengal legislation also toughens the punishments in child abuse cases as laid down by the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Besides toughening penalties, the Bengal legislation includes provisions for setting up special courts to hear sexual violence cases and task forces to investigate them.

What Comes Next

The legislation moved by the ruling Trinamool Congress cleared the Bengal House comfortably with the support of both the ruling party and the Opposition, but it will need President Droupadi Murmu’s assent before it can come into force. Criminal Law comes in the concurrent list. This means that a law passed by a state Assembly can be implemented even if it is odds by a law passed by Parliament, provided it has the President’s assent. But the President acts on the advice of ministers, and it is the Centre that will decide on whether this Bill becomes an Act. The Trinamool is a key rival of the BJP, which is in power at the Centre, and therefore, Aparajita Bill is unlikely to get a green signal.

Earlier, the Andhra Pradesh Assembly and the Maharashtra Assembly had passed Bills mandating death penalty in rape and gangrape cases. None of them have got Presidential assent so far.

Politics Behind The Bill

Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee is well aware of the fact that the Aparajita Bill is unlikely to get the President’s go-ahead and its stringent provisions won’t see the light of the day. Why then did her party push it through the Assembly? The answer to this is in massive outrage against her government over the August 9 rape-murder incident.

Ms Banerjee is under fire from the Opposition and the civil society over the heinous crime at the state-run hospital. In an attempt to turn the tables on the main Opposition BJP, the Trinamool leadership has demanded a central law for death penalty in rape cases. This legislation appears to be another damage control exercise to manage the public perception and counter the criticism in the RG Kar rape-murder case, in which the BJP has accused her of shielding those responsible.