Live · Global · Independent
Live Feeds
PinkVilla
Forbes
NDTV
Hindustan Times
Chief Minister’s “Ram-Ram” Post Amid Madhya Pradesh Suspense
onmynews.com

Chief Minister’s “Ram-Ram” Post Amid Madhya Pradesh Suspense

Two days ahead of a crucial meeting of the newly elected BJP MLAs, Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Saturday posted the message “Sabhi ko Ram-Ram (`Ram Ram’ to all)” on X.

The post, accompanied by Mr Chouhan’s picture, sparked off speculation as “Ram Ram” is used both as a greeting as well as a parting message.

सभी को राम-राम… pic.twitter.com/QpaOxpZyMk

— Office of Shivraj (@OfficeofSSC) December 9, 2023

But the state BJP chief VD Sharma maintained that the MLAs and the top leadership will decide who becomes the next chief minister of the state following the BJP’s landslide victory in the last month’s assembly elections.

“The three (central) observers will arrive in Bhopal on Monday morning. The MLAs will meet at 4 pm to elect their leader. Invitations have been sent to the MLAs. The process of the party would be followed and a decision will be taken,” Mr Sharma told reporters.

Asked about Mr Chouhan’s tweet, he said, “This is (Lord) Ram’s country. On January 22, a grand idol of Lord Ram will be consecrated at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. We greet each other in the morning by saying `Ram, Ram’. It is our culture to start the day with the name of Ram.” The BJP was a cadre-based organisation and the party workers will accept and respect any decision taken by the leadership, he added.

“Our leadership…honourable prime minister, honourable Amit Shah ji, honorable BJP president J P Nadda and central leadership will take a call. The decision will be respected by the workers… our leadership will decide,” Sharma said.

To another question, he said, “The MLAs will decide their leader.” The BJP on Friday appointed Haryana chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar, the party’s OBC Morcha head K Laxman and its secretary Asha Lakra as observers for the election of its legislature party leaders in Madhya Pradesh.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Read full article
“India Responded Resolutely, Determinedly”: Minister On China Border Row
onmynews.com

“India Responded Resolutely, Determinedly”: Minister On China Border Row

India has had an “exceptionally difficult” challenge along the northern borders in the last three years and the country responded to it very resolutely and has been maintaining the kind of military deployment necessary for national security, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said on Saturday on the lingering row in eastern Ladakh with China.

He said this in an address at the FICCI, while explaining how the PM Modi government makes choices after choices with confidence however difficult and tough they may be.

“It could even be what happens at our border. Again you all know in the last three years, we have had an exceptionally difficult time in terms of the challenges on our northern borders,” Mr Jaishankar said.

“Even though this happened in the middle of Covid, yet we responded very resolutely, very determinedly, and to date we are still deployed in whatever manner is necessary for our national security,” he said.

The Indian and Chinese troops are locked in an over three-year confrontation in certain friction points in eastern Ladakh even as the two sides completed disengagement from several areas following extensive diplomatic and military talks.

Mr Jaishankar also explained how India, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, tried to create global awareness against terrorism or went ahead for cooperation under the Quad framework though there was a narrative that it could make somebody uncomfortable, seen as an oblique reference to China.

“If somebody else is uncomfortable, that’s their problem,” he said.

“At the end of the day, we have to do what we have to do. However difficult and tough that is. It is about the confidence of being able to exercise choice after choice,” he said, adding such an approach will “define us as Bharat”.

The external affairs minister also cited how India confronted the challenge of terrorism.

“There is no society which is more traumatised in the modern era than us when it comes to terrorism,” he said, noting the Modi government showed a sense of resolution to “shape” the global agenda on it.

Without specifically mentioning India’s continuing procurement of crude oil from Russia, Mr Jaishankar asserted that its choices on energy purchases were driven by national interests.

“When it came to our energy purchases, our national choices and national interests were supposed to be subservient to the political correctness of other countries who by the way had made their own arrangements to soften the blow for themselves,” he said.

India maintained its purchase of crude oil from Russia notwithstanding pressure from the West to not do so in view of the Ukraine conflict.

Talking about the India growth story, Mr Jaishankar said there is no question that the “world looks at us as an exceptionally strong area of growth”.

“We have made big decisions but we are clearly poised to make many more. We have nursed big ambitions, we have implemented much of what we promised but again there is still a lot we have to achieve,” he said.

“To me Vikshit Bharat — it is both a vision to achieve as well as a set of specific goals and a short description of it would be to really how to make India a developed country in the next 25 years,” he added.

The external affairs minister described the last five years as “very traumatic for the world” and cited as reasons the “Covid shock”, developments in Afghanistan following the withdrawal of the US troops, the impact of the Ukraine conflict, the ongoing violence in the Middle-East and the implications of the competition between the US and China on global supply chains.

Mr Jaishankar said the world is today moving towards greater insecurity and more protectionism, adding the trading rules implemented globally in the last two to three decades have actually raised a lot of question marks about their effectiveness.

Today, we are really looking at what happens when trading rules are gamed and when competition has been unfair and when the insecurities of the Covid-era have caused many geographies, many regions, big economies to talk about strategic autonomy, he added.

Mr Jaishankar said while it is acknowledged that opening up to the world is good, but at the same added that “opening up to the world must happen only when there is a level playing field for our own industry at home”.

“It cannot be at the cost of our industry and I think that is one message that the Modi government has given in a sustained manner over the last one decade,” he said.

The external affairs minister described the industry leaders as “builders of national strength”.

“I think that is a larger responsibility that must always be in your mind,” he said.

Mr Jaishankar also called on the big businesses to help India build its own supply chains.

“I think it is important, especially for big businesses in India to help build Indian supply chains, to support Indian vendors. Because at the end of the day, no country will be strong if it does not have its own supply chain, if it does not have basic requirements,” he added.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Read full article
Hadiya, Whose Conversion Sparked Row In Kerala, Untraceable, Claims Father
onmynews.com

Hadiya, Whose Conversion Sparked Row In Kerala, Untraceable, Claims Father

The family of Hadiya, whose conversion to Islam and subsequent marriage to a man named Shafin Jahan resulted in a controversy, has moved the Kerala High Court saying that they were unable to trace her for the past one month.

Her father, Asokan K M, has moved the High Court saying he apprehends that his daughter has been taken into illegal custody by certain people including her husband, who are allegedly part of the banned Popular Front of India.

The plea may come up for hearing on Tuesday, a lawyer in connection with the matter said.

Asokan told the high court that for the past one month, Hadiya was untraceable to him and his wife.

He claimed that whenever they called their daughter, either she was not receiving any calls or on many occasions, the mobile phone was switched off.

Asokan also claimed that they went to her recently opened homoeo clinic at Malappuram but it was found closed and the neighbours didn’t have any idea about the same.

“Any kind of harm can be caused to the detenu by the persons behind the 4th and the 6th respondents who are the active members of the PFI, the banned organisation. Now the detenu is under the control of this gang and unless she is produced before the Hon’ble court and sent along with the petitioner, her life would be in danger,” the petition said.

The fourth respondent in the petition is A S Sainaba, the former office-bearer of National Women’s Front, the women’s wing of banned PFI and the sixth respondent is Hadiya’s husband, Jahan.

Asokan also claimed before the court that Hadiya has told the family that she got separated from her husband.

Meanwhile, a few days ago, Hadiya spoke to a regional television channel in which she claimed that she got separated from her husband Jahan.

She also said that she got married again to another person and it was her personal matter.

“The Sangh Parivar is using my father as a tool. He is playing according to their tunes,” she was seen saying in the interview to the TV channel.

She claimed that she was in regular touch with her parents and despite that her parents were causing trouble.

Hadiya, had converted to Islam during her medical studies in Coimbatore and married Jahan in 2016 when she was 25 years old.

Soon, Asokan had filed a writ petition in the High Court saying the conversion was forced and Jahan had links to extremist organisations like PFI. He had also argued that she would be trafficked to Syria to join the Islamic State.

The High Court had then annulled the marriage, calling it a ‘sham’.

However, Jahan later approached the Supreme Court and in 2018, the top court had set aside the High Court order.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Read full article
Link copied!