4 killed, 7 injured as car collides with bus in Assam’s Goalpara

​ 

India Today | India 

Food allergies are not uncommon. Most of us have at least one family member or a friend who is lactose intolerant or allergic to specific foods like mushrooms, nuts, fish, or certain types of flour. It is quite typical for individuals with allergies to double-check their options while dining out. Have you ever encountered someone walking into a restaurant with a long list of allergens? If not, one such instance is making waves on Reddit. In a picture shared by a user, not one, not two, but over 17 items were listed, Sound unbelievable? But trust us, it has really happened.

In the image, the header at the top of the list stated “Food allergies,” followed by the message, “Cannot eat the following foods.” The list began with specific restrictions, stating, “Any protein that is not fresh/or was not just unfrozen (i.e. can’t have leftovers, can only have proteins cooked to order).” After that, it included a range of food items like strawberries, bananas, eggplant, spinach, soy, tomato, chocolate, beans, and avocado.

The caption of the picture read, “Customer came into the restaurant and gave the waiters this allergy list.” Click here for the post. 

Also Read: Viral Now: This New York Restaurant Is Reminding People Of ‘The Menu’ Movie

The post in no time got all over the internet, with comment section filling with unfiltered opinions of the netizens.

A user wrote, “I would hand it back and tell him for complete safety, he should cook at home. That the restaurant can’t guarantee any cross-contamination between all these foods. Then show him out. This sounds like a lawsuit in waiting.”

Another one added, “How are they even alive?”

“Just hand them the menu and ask them to pick what they can eat,” read a comment.

A person said, “Just tell them you can’t serve them due to it being a safety issue.”

Have you ever dined out with someone who had such a long list of food allergies? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments.

The Aam Aadmi Party is planning to file a review petition against the Supreme Court’s decision rejecting former Delhi deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia’s bail plea, party sources said on Monday.

In a setback to Mr Sisodia, the top court earlier in the day rejected his regular bail pleas in corruption and money-laundering cases related to the alleged Delhi excise policy scam and said the transfer of Rs 338 crore was tentatively established in the matter.

“The party is planning to file a review petition against the order,” a party source said.

A bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice SVN Bhatti said it has recorded the statements of the probe agencies that the trial in these cases will conclude in six to eight months.

But if the trial proceeds in a “sloppy manner”, Mr Sisodia will be at liberty to apply for bail in these cases in three months, the bench said.

AAP leader Atishi said the party and its leaders respect the Supreme Court but do not agree with its order.

At a press conference here after the order, Atishi said the court has given an “adverse order” despite making sharp observations against probe agencies.

“While his bail plea was being heard, the Supreme Court constantly asked the ED tough questions like where is the money trail. The apex court also pointed out that the case is based on the statement of one approver Dinesh Arora,” she said.

“Despite these sharp observations, the SC gave an adverse verdict. We will study that order deeply and explore our legal options and decide our next step,” she added.