During the trailer launch of her upcoming film Kho Gaye Hum Kahan, Ananya Panday explained why she is no longer active on social media.

She said, “The reason why I’m saying that I’m not that active on social media anymore is because this film made me realise the things I was doing wrong. Post, making my life look all fun and exciting when I was crying in the corner sometimes. So, it made me realize it was cathartic for me.”

The actress also discussed her friendship with her co-stars Adarsh Gourav and Siddhant Chaturvedi during the event. She mentioned how director Arjun Varain Singh played a role in rekindling her bond with Siddhant after Gehraiyaan. She expressed her appreciation for Arjun and the team for taking them on a trip to Goa where they became best friends. She hopes that this friendship translates well on-screen.

Kho Gaye Hum Kahan is a movie about three best friends, Imaad, Ahana, and Neil. It depicts their lives, struggles, and relationships. The movie is produced by Zoya Akhtar, Farhan Akhtar, and others and co-written by Arjun Varain Singh, Zoya Akhtar, and Reema Kagti. It is set to release on December 26, 2023.

See Also: Kho Gaye Hum Kahan trailer drop: Ananya Panday, Siddhant Chaturvedi and Adarsh Gourav get clicked 

The Supreme Court today upheld the Centre’s move to scrap special status to Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution. A five-member bench of the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud ruled that Article 370 was a temporary provision to ease Jammu and Kashmir’s merger with India.

The Supreme Court also ordered the Election Commission to hold election in Jammu and Kashmir by September 2024.

Jammu and Kashmir did not retain sovereignty when it joined India and its constituent assembly ceased to exist the moment it merged with India, the Supreme Court said, referring to why special status was not needed.

“The J&K constituent assembly was not intended to be a permanent body. It was formed only to frame the Constitution. The recommendation of the Constituent Assembly was not binding on the President,” the Supreme Court said.

The Supreme Court, however, explained why the state continued to enjoy special status even after its merger with India, despite the state not having “internal sovereignty”.

“When the constituent assembly ceased to exist, the special condition for which Article 370 was introduced also ceased to exist. But the situation in the state remained, and thus the Article continued,” the Supreme Court said.

“All states in the country have legislative and executive power, albeit to differing degrees. Article 371A to 371J are examples of special arrangements for different states. This is an example of asymmetric federalism… Jammu and Kashmir does not have internal sovereignty different from other states,” the Supreme Court said.

The bench gave three separate judgments – one authored by Chief Justice Chandrachud on behalf of himself, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant; another concurring judgment by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, and a third judgment concurring with the other two by Justice Sanjiv Khanna.

Article 370 gave Jammu and Kashmir its own Constitution and decision-making rights for all matters barring defence, communications and foreign affairs. Its removal ended special status to the state.

Contained within Article 370 was Article 35A, which allowed the erstwhile state to define who it acknowledged as permanent residents and gave special rights, such as government jobs and owning property.

The Supreme Court said it did not find it necessary to see whether the reorganisation of Jammu and Kashmir into a Union Territory was valid since it was a temporary arrangement until the election and restoration of statehood.