Live · Global · Independent
Live Feeds
PinkVilla
Forbes
NDTV
Hindustan Times
Why Is Wendy Williams’ Guardian Suing A&E Networks Again? New Complaint Explored Amid Lifetime Documentary Controversy
onmynews.com

Why Is Wendy Williams’ Guardian Suing A&E Networks Again? New Complaint Explored Amid Lifetime Documentary Controversy

Sabrina Morrissey, who serves as the guardian of Wendy Williams has recently filed a lawsuit against A&E Television Networks, Lifetime, EOne Productions, Creature Films and executive producer Mark Ford. The legal action follows soon after the controversial release of Where Is Wendy Williams? a documentary concerning the life of the television host as seen through the guardianship system.

The documentary released in February 2024 where Morrisey attempted to stop it by claiming that Wilams having primary progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia could not understand or give permission for the filming or what the documentary was about.

As stated in the complaint reported by People, the defendants took advantage of the situation because Williams was not in good health which made them tease and shame Williams. The suit claims that Williams was paid a dismal amount of 82,000 USD out of the total amount of earnings from the documentary, whereas the production companies turned out to have earned millions in return.

These defendants, according to Morrissey, absconded with the valid agreement when they went ahead to make the publication and released the movie without the guardian’s approval, fully aware of the defendants’ severe short- and long-term memory issues and physical disabilities.

According to the lawsuit, Williams’ declining health was exploited by the defendants for profit, thereby humiliating and demeaning her. The allegation states that as of May 2022, Williams has been placed under the support of a legal guardianship wherein the purpose is to prevent depletion of her funds depriving her of control over her legal rights.

Due to the denial of the claim she has been residing in a nursing home to help with her ‘cognition’ due to a diagnosis of dementia.

In her assertions, Morrissey states that the film-makers understood Williams was not able to give any form of approval. The complaint states, “Defendants took advantage of W.W.H in the cruelest, most obscene way possible for their own financial gain.”

As per the outlet, the lawsuit requests that any income generated from the documentary be used to assist with Williams’ chronic and expensive medical treatment. The suit also seeks an order restricting A&E and Lifetime from broadcasting or distributing the said documentary any further, alleging that Williams’ rights were pretty much violated.

The suit further accuses the moviemakers of capturing the most vulnerable moments of Wendy Williams, filming her struggles with addiction, physical ailments, and deteriorating mental health, all while ridiculing her and failing to protect her dignity.

ALSO READ: Wendy Williams Seen For The First Time In More Than A Year At New Jersey Holistic Store; Find Out What She Was Doing There

Read full article
In Big Step Towards One Nation, One Election, Cabinet Clears Plan
onmynews.com

In Big Step Towards One Nation, One Election, Cabinet Clears Plan

The Union Cabinet has approved the government’s ‘one nation, one election‘ push – which proposes simultaneous Lok Sabha and Assembly elections, with urban body and panchayat polls to be held within the next 100 days – accepting the report of a panel led by ex-President Ram Nath Kovind.

“There is unanimous opinion simultaneous polls (beginning from 2029, sources told NDTV earlier) should be held,” the panel, which included Home Minister Amit Shah, Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal, as its members, had said. The panel also outlined provisions for a ‘unity government’ in cases of an indefinite result or a no-confidence motion; it had been tasked with recommending such solutions.

The ‘one nation, one election’ proposal was part of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s manifesto for the 2019 and 2024 general elections, but has drawn heavy criticism from the opposition, who have red-flagged concerns over changes to the Constitution and practical challenges, including cutting short the terms of certain Assemblies to align them with the proposed new round of elections.

Sources within an undeterred government told NDTV last month the proposal would definitely be implemented in this, the third, term of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Mr Modi had said as much during his Independence Day address and he is committed to keeping his word, sources said.

READ | “‘One Nation, One Election’ Is Our Commitment”: PM Modi

Placing the report before the Cabinet was on the agenda for the first 100 days of the PM’s third term. 

What ‘One Nation, One Election’ Panel Said

Holding simultaneous poll will “transform the electoral process (and) governance” and “optimise scarce resources”, the high-profile panel said, noting 32 parties and prominent judicial figures, including former Supreme Court Chief Justices and High Court judges, had backed this measure.

Among the panel’s listed advantages for the ‘one nation, one election’ measure are that it makes the electoral process easier for voters. Synchronising polls will also result in higher and faster economic growth, and therefore a more stable economy, the panel argued, claiming a single round of elections will allow businesses and corporate firms to take decisions without fear of adverse policy changes.

The panel has also reasoned that (eventually) holding elections at all three levels – for the Lok Sabha, for state Assemblies, and for panchayats – will “avoid disruption of supply chains and production cycles due to migrant workers seeking leave of absence to cast their votes”.

The ‘one nation, one election’ push will also “prevent policy paralysis”, and do away with the “atmosphere of uncertainty” the government argues is brought on by frequent elections.

The panel, which gave its report in March, also said it had studied “best practices from other countries”, and consulted economists and the Election Commission, before delivering its verdict.

What Government Said

Information and Broadcasting Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw has said the ‘one nation, one election’ system will be implemented in two phases, with a single list to identify eligible voters for all polls.

“We will start the discussion (on implementation) pan-India,” he told reporters, underlining that 80 per cent of respondents supported the ‘one nation, one election’ push during initial talks.

There is “widespread support” for this system, he said.

Former Union Minister Anurag Thakur, in March, pointed out that before 1962 simultaneous elections were, in fact, the norm. This only changed after 1962, he told NDTV, “If some state elections are advanced or kept on hold, 10-15 polls can be held together… If we save this money India won’t have to wait for 2047, but will achieve its ‘Viksit Bharat‘ (developed India) dreams much before.”

Last year, before the Ram Nath Kovind-led panel was announced, the Law Minister outlined the government’s rationale and told Parliament simultaneous elections represent financial savings as it cuts down on multiple deployment of security forces, and also helps political parties save money.

What Opposition Said

However, 15 parties, including the Congress, have opposed the ‘one nation, one election’ push.

The Congress has said this proposal is “not pragmatic and practical”. Party boss Mallikarjun Kharge, while releasing the party’s manifesto for next month’s Haryana election, called it “an attempt to divert the attention of the public”. “This is not going to succeed… the people will not accept it.”

READ | Not Practical: 15 Parties Rubbish “One Nation, One Election” Plan

“When elections come, and they don’t have issues to raise, they divert attention…” Mr Kharge said.

Last week senior Congress leader P Chidambaram said the ‘one nation, one election’ system is not possible under the present Constitution, as it requires at least five constitutional amendments.

However, as things stand in both Houses, the BJP-led ruling alliance has the numbers to pass these amendments, particularly after last month’s unopposed election of 12 Rajya Sabha MPs. 

Other opposition parties, specifically those in the Congress-led INDIA bloc, have also been critical of this measure. While releasing its manifesto for the Lok Sabha election, Tamil Nadu’s DMK vowed to scrap the ‘one nation, one election’ proposal if the INDIA bloc were to win the election.

Also, regional parties had pointed out concerns that limited resources could hamper them in highlighting local issues to voters, particularly in the face of frenzy over national issues in a Lok Sabha election.

Another red flag was the cost of procuring EVMs, or electronic voting machines.

This, the poll panel had said, would be approximately Rs 10,000 crore every 15 years.

What Is ‘One Nation, One Election’?

Simply put, it means all Indians will vote in Lok Sabha, Assembly, and local body elections – to pick central, state, and local representatives – in the same year, if not at the same time.

At present, only a few states vote for a new government at the same time as the country selects a new union administration. These few are Andhra Pradesh, Sikkim, and Odisha, all of which voted at the same time as the April-June Lok Sabha election.

NDTV Explains | ‘One Nation, One Election’. What Is It And How It Can Work

Haryana votes next month, with Jharkhand and Maharashtra also voting this year. The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir is holding its first Assembly election in a decade.

The rest follow a non-synced five-year cycle; Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Telangana, for example, were among those voting at different times last year. And this has been flagged by the opposition, which has warned against cutting short the terms of the state’s respective governments.

Of these four, the BJP rules Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan. The Congress rules Karnataka and Telangana, both of which voted last year and are not scheduled to vote again till 2028.

NDTV is now available on WhatsApp channels. Click on the link to get all the latest updates from NDTV on your chat.

Read full article
Not Practical: 15 Opposition Parties Rubbish “One Nation, One Election” Plan
onmynews.com

Not Practical: 15 Opposition Parties Rubbish “One Nation, One Election” Plan

Fifteen Opposition parties, spearheaded by the Congress, have set themselves against the “One Nation One Election” proposal, which was green-lighted by the Union cabinet today. The proposal — part of the report of the panel headed by former President Ram Nath Kovind — has been adopted, Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw told the media after the cabinet meeting.

The Congress has said the plan is not pragmatic or practical. Party chief Mallikarjun Kharge has called it “an attempt to divert the attention of the public”.

“This is not going to succeed… the people will not accept it,” he said while releasing its manifesto for next month’s assembly elections in Haryana.

Under the plan, which proposes simultaneous Lok Sabha and Assembly elections, is backed by the NDA and many judges of the Supreme Court. Under it, urban body and panchayat polls have to be held within 100 days of the general and state election.

But implementing it would require two-third majority in parliament, since it involves amendment of the constitution. At least six amendments would be required to bring it into effect. After this, it has to be ratified by all states and Union Territories.

While the NDA has a simple majority in both houses of parliament, getting two-thirds majority in either house could prove a challenge. Of the 245 seats in Rajya Sabha, the NDA has 112, the Opposition parties 85. For a two-thirds majority, the government needs at least 164 votes.

Even in the Lok Sabha, the NDA has 292 of 545 seats. The two-thirds majority mark stands at 364.  But the situation could be dynamic, since the majority would be counted only in terms of the members present and voting.

Read full article
Link copied!