Live · Global · Independent
Live Feeds
PinkVilla
Forbes
NDTV
Hindustan Times
Michael Jackson’s Mother Katherine Gets Her Challenge Rejected As Court Clears $600M Sale of King Of Pop’s Catalog To Sony Music
onmynews.com

Michael Jackson’s Mother Katherine Gets Her Challenge Rejected As Court Clears $600M Sale of King Of Pop’s Catalog To Sony Music

Recently, a California appeals court ruled in favor of Michael Jackson’s estate, paving the way for a $600 million sale of the late singer’s catalog to Sony Music. This decision was made despite objections from his mother, Katherine Jackson, who argued that the sale was against Jackson’s wishes. However, the court determined that the sale was authorized by John Branca and John McClain, the executors of Jackson’s estate, under the very broad powers granted to them by his will.

In its final decision, issued after an earlier tentative ruling against Katherine’s objections, the court noted that Jackson’s will empowered the executors to sell assets of the estate, including those involved in this transaction with Sony. Additionally, the court rejected Katherine’s appeal on procedural grounds, citing her failure to present her arguments before a lower probate court, as reported by Billboard.

The lawyers representing Katherine Jackson have remained silent about the judgment rendered by this appellate court. According to the aforementioned outlet, the court stated, “The will gave the executors broad powers of sale, with no exception for the specific assets at issue in this case. As such, [a lower judge] did not err in concluding that it was Michael’s intent to allow the executors to sell any estate assets, including those at issue in the proposed transaction.”

Earlier reports revealed plans for Sony Music to purchase half of Michael Jackson‘s catalog in a deal valued at over $600 million, first reported in 2022. Since the Beat It singer passed away over fifteen years ago in 2009, his estate has continued to be administered through a Los Angeles probate court. Consequently, Judge Mitchell Beckloff was compelled to grant permission for the undisclosed agreement, which was facilitated by the estate’s representatives, trustees John Branca and John McClain.

Katherine Jackson argued that the sale was not in line with Michael’s wishes, as there were possibilities of price increases if the assets were held longer. She claimed that this sale would violate basic inheritance rules since none of the King of Pop’s assets could be transferred to his heirs.

However, Judge Beckloff dismissed Katherine’s argument in April 2023, allowing the sale to proceed. Katherine then filed another appeal, which led to yesterday’s decision reaffirming that “the executors have full power and authority.” The court further noted that the transaction was an asset sale that provided substantial cash income to the estate while maintaining its overall value.

This legal battle has exposed tensions among Michael Jackson’s heirs. For instance, this year Jackson’s son Blanket asked the court to stop Katherine from using money from Michael’s trust fund on her lawsuit against Sony. Disagreeing initially with the sale, Blanket and his other siblings later accepted the probate judge’s ruling.

ALSO READ: Taylor Swift Breaks THIS Michael Jackson Record at the Wembley Stadium; Singer Thanks Her Fans

Read full article
“Will Return To Work”: AIIMS Doctors’ Body After Supreme Court’s Appeal
onmynews.com

“Will Return To Work”: AIIMS Doctors’ Body After Supreme Court’s Appeal

Resident doctors at Delhi’s AIIMS hospital have called off a strike and protests over the rape and murder of a colleague at Kolkata’s RG Kar Hospital earlier this month.

In a statement issued Thursday afternoon the RDA said they had done so after receiving assurances from the Supreme Court, which had urged medical professionals across the country to return to their duties.

Read full article
“Don’t Politicise”: Chief Justice To Centre, Bengal In Kolkata Rape-Murder
onmynews.com

“Don’t Politicise”: Chief Justice To Centre, Bengal In Kolkata Rape-Murder

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud today urged counsels for the Centre and West Bengal governments to not politicise the Kolkata doctor’s rape and murder case and stressed that the law is taking its course.

The Chief Justice made the observation during a heated exchange between Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta and Bengal government’s counsel Kapil Sibal during the hearing in Supreme Court. Mr Sibal requested the court to take steps so that inciting statements are not made. To this, Mr Mehta responded, “Nobody should make any statement. We have the statement of a sitting minister of the state of West Bengal. This is something very serious. (The minister said) that if anybody speaks anything against leader, fingers will be chopped off.”

In response, Mr Sibal said, “Then I will read the Leader of the Opposition’s statement. ‘Bullets will be fired’ is what he said. Suvendu (Adhikari) has said.”

“Please don’t politicise this, the law will take its course. We are ensuring that the law does take its course after a quick and efficient investigation,” the Chief Justice said.

The statement comes amid a massive political row surrounding the chilling crime in the Bengal capital. Main Opposition BJP has been holding protests and targeting the ruling Trinamool Congress. The Mamata Banerjee-led party has alleged that the BJP is levelling false allegations to malign the state government’s image. 

The bench, also comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra, said it is also concerned about the welfare and safety of doctors. “We are not just going to lay down guidelines, we are going to pass an enforceable direction,” the bench said.

During the hearing, several lawyers representing different groups of doctors expressed concerns of action against them for joining the protests that demand justice for the victim as well as safer working conditions for healthcare professionals.

Justice and medicine, the Chief Justice said, cannot go on strike. Earlier, the bench said doctors must resume their duties because the poor people of the country cannot be left in the lurch.

At the start of the proceedings, a lawyer appearing for resident doctors in AIIMS Nagpur said the medicos are being marked absent because they are on protest.

“If they are on duty, they will not be marked absent and if they are not on duty, then law will be followed. Ask them to first return to work, no one will take adverse action against any doctor. If there is difficulty after that, then come to us, but let them first report to work,” the Chief Justice of India said.

He added that in some cases, people wait for as much as two years for doctors’ appointments. “Poor people cannot be left in the lurch.”

The court has set up a National Task Force to recommend steps to improve working conditions for healthcare professional and ensure their safety.  

Read full article
Link copied!